your opinion…

Ranveer Singh won several awards for his mind-blowing performance in Band Baaja Barat when compared to Rajat who was also fabulous in Udaan.

Who do you think actually deserved the awards???

8 thoughts on “your opinion…

  1. Ranvir’s performance was natural. he did not seem to be a newcomer. on the other hand, Rajat acted well but it was nothing extraordinary. i think Ranvir deserved it

  2. THE ONLY ACTOR THAT DID NOT DESERVE THE AWARD AT FICCI WAS SHAHRUKH AND AISH. ALL AISH’S MOVIE’S ARE MEANINGLESS WITH HER ANNOYING ACTING. THE BEST ACTOR AWARD SHOULD HAD BEEN GIVEN TO SALMAN FOR DABAANG. BUT SINCE IT WAS KARAN JOHAR AND YASH CHOPRA WHO ORGANIZED THIS EVENT SO OBVIOUSLY SRK HAD TO WIN EVEN IF HIS MOVIE WAS FULL OF SHIT.

  3. rajat deserve more as his movie was not advertise more than ranveers b3, more over rajat acting is far better than ranveer so mostly i think rajat deserve it. till award function i did n’t even hear the movie uddan after awards i went and watched the movie and the movie is also intersting

  4. rajat deserve more as his movie was not advertise more than ranveers b3, more over rajat acting is far better than ranveer so mostly i think rajat deserve it. till award function i did n’t even hear the movie uddan after awards i went and watched the movie and the movie is also intersting

Leave a Reply