15th January 2009

Amitabh Bachchan doesn’t approve Slumdog Millionaire

posted in Bollywood News |

amitabh-bachchan.gif

Amitabh Bachchan has criticized Slumdog Millionaire’s success and believes it only made big internationally because of its Western director- Danny Boyle.

Slumdog Millionaire has come not only under Big B’s ire but also many Indians feel that the flick only focused on the bad and under developed part of India.

Big B wrote on his blog, “If SM (Slumdog Millionaire) projects India as a Third World dirty underbelly developing nation and causes pain and disgust among nationalists and patriots, let it be known that a murky underbelly exists and thrives even in the most developed nations.”

“It’s just that the SM idea, authored by an Indian and conceived and cinematically put together by a Westerner, gets creative (Golden) Globe recognition. The other would perhaps not.”

Bachchan also voiced his opinion on how Bollywood is changing itself to get accepted internationally.

He says, “The commercial escapist world of Indian cinema had vociferously battled for years, on the attention paid and the adulation given to the legendary Satyajit Ray… and not a word of appreciation for the entertaining mass-oriented box office blockbusters that were being churned out from Mumbai.

“Ray portrayed reality. While, the other – escapism, fantasy and incredulous posturing. Unimpressive for Cannes and Berlin and Venice (film festivals).”

“But look how rapidly all that is changing. Dedicated TV channels running Hindi cinema on prime timings. Premieres at Leicester Square (referring to ‘Chandni Chowk To China’), the home of all Hollywood royalty, thronged by hundreds on the street in cold biting weather.”

So do you agree with Mr.Bachchan’s views?

There are currently 45 responses to “Amitabh Bachchan doesn’t approve Slumdog Millionaire”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On January 15th, 2009, preeti said:

    I agree big B, I agree

  2. 2 On January 15th, 2009, Ritu said:

    I think he has a point, but he may also be a little bit bitter about such great recognition going to others in the industry such as Rahman, Anil Kapoor, Irrfan etc. instead of him.

  3. 3 On January 15th, 2009, N said:

    I agree with ritu totally!!

  4. 4 On January 15th, 2009, fiona said:

    black was a stupid film when aamir commented on his dislike big b was offended so now what is he on about…

  5. 5 On January 15th, 2009, zeenat said:

    i JUST HE IS PISSED CAUSE HE WASN’T CHOSEN TO PLAY aNIL KAPOOR’S ROLE ‘CAUSE HE WAS THE ORIGINAL HOST OF “KAUN BANEGA KARORPATI”. STOP BEING A SUCK AND GROW UP BIG B. TYPICAL INDIAN NOT HAPPY ON OTHERS SUCCESS CAUSE IT WASN’T HIM OR HIS SON OR HIS DAUGHTER IN LAW.

    #2 IT SHOWS HIM HIS OWN FACE IN THE MIRROR. IT TOOK A FOREIGNER TO MAKE A TRUE MOVIE ABOUT BOMBAY. PLUS DANNY BOYL ACTUALLY TOOK THOSE KID ACTORS LITERALLY OF THE STREET , THE R FROM THE SLUMS NOT ACTORS AND NOT SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF ACTORS. HE HAS ACTUALLY PUT THEM THRU SCHOOL AND MADE A TRUST FUND FOR COLLEGE. ONCE AGAIN IT TOOK A FOREIGNER TO CHANGE THREE CHILDREN’S LIFE . INSTEAD OF GIVING THEM TOYS AND PRESENTS. HE GAVE THEM A CHANCE OF LIFE. WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME ANY OF THESE ACTORS PUT SOMEONE THRU COLLEGE AND DONE IT EVER SO QUIETLY AND HUMILITY. I AM VERY DISAPPOINTED IN YOU MR. BACHAN.

  6. 6 On January 15th, 2009, shilpa said:

    zeenat i agree with u totally

  7. 7 On January 15th, 2009, Amitabh Bachchan doesn’t approve Slumdog Millionaire | Gossip News and Rumors said:

    [...] [Source] Anjum [...]

  8. 8 On January 15th, 2009, Ritu said:

    lol. I was also just thinking Mr B, if you’re so against Cannes, then why were you so busy making your presence felt there last time?

  9. 9 On January 15th, 2009, some one in india said:

    i think he did not like the movie because sm made big internationally success and he was not part of this movie..
    also his son was not pick in this movie..that’s why he is not happy with
    this movie..we all in india is so so so happy about this movie..making
    name in hollywood..people in hollywood really like the movie..they see people in sulm are so
    happy in life..this is india..u get loots of happy in slum..not rich country..
    big b is racess..he is talking about western diredtor made this movie that’s y it is success
    that is totly wrong of bachchan..even tho indian director did this movie it will have same
    success,,,u big b need to change your thinking..u are old and iodit..ok stope making movie and
    talking about othere ppl buss…get a life…big b…

  10. 10 On January 15th, 2009, didi said:

    I don’t agree with him, I would much rather see a movie that depicts life while telling a story. The raw and real emotion in slumdog M. couldn’t be achieved without it. Hinda has slums, deal with it. Problems are there and you can’t ignore them.

  11. 11 On January 15th, 2009, ziba1250 said:

    I agree with zeenat. I think Big B is just has nothing better these day then just sit and blog about every movie. This is real india. You cannot always show india with beautiful guy in rich cars and beautiful girls in rich clothes and there running around singing and dancing and making out with each other. Real India has a lot of proverty in it. It has women living with Aids and HIV and raisign there kids who have them also. Real India is also has kids that have lost there parents and they are on the streets trying to make ends meet. Not everyone in India is names Rahul and can have there dad pay for a ticket to go to Switzerland and travel and fall in love with a girl and then sign and that is all.

    Indian movie makers only know how to copy movies. There has only been very few Indian movies that are not being copied. The movies they use to make talked about the real India. These days there too worried about having the right about of kissing and showing skin to worry about the plot and story of the movie.

    I think he needs to think back about his old movies where he use to work in the type of movies that had meaning and he played the poor guy on the streets a a lot.

    This is nothing to do with Indian or British directors, he is just a jealousy old man.

  12. 12 On January 15th, 2009, raz said:

    the director did not lie……he showed the world that we can effort to pay raise up the poors and we are going and send rocket to space…thats a shame….

  13. 13 On January 15th, 2009, raz said:

    I ment we can not effort to pay….

  14. 14 On January 15th, 2009, niyandra said:

    well i dont agree with big.B,i think he is a bit jealous.
    why dont he blog about the fact that in almost all the bollywood movies the family’s are veryy rich,have a big house and a very high paid job?!
    its so on realistic!!
    he is just being a hypocritical…………

  15. 15 On January 15th, 2009, aati said:

    i m totally agry with all of you!!!!!!!!!1
    amit gi has gone old and he cant act no more and he cant take any other actor or actress
    he only likes his own family the flopy family.
    have u seend drona oh my God what waist of money and look at ash
    white cow she is beautiful but even she has worked for hollywood
    but amit ge wants all the success for his own family
    FACE THE TRUTH MAN
    AND I M HIS BIGEST FAN COZ HE IS GREAT ACTOR NO DOUT

  16. 16 On January 15th, 2009, murali said:

    Well! Mr. ‘So called’ Big B…..take this. With no doubt we respect you as our very own mega star and stuff, but perhaps you have forgotten the basic idea behind film making….well! it is for entertainment and you have made several stupid movies (the worst of them being BOOM) in this regard. And also if come to the content of SDM, well appreciate the film making first and for sure do appreciate the content,story and experiance the real india some miles in a slum from your home.

  17. 17 On January 15th, 2009, nnena said:

    miserable old bugger thats what he is now

  18. 18 On January 15th, 2009, - said:

    Slumdog Millionaire doesn’t show JUST poverty, but it also shows that in mumbai, poor & RICH ppl. live! it shows that they live in the same city but have differnet lifestyles. this movie showed the true mumbai, & i salute Danny Boyle & all the actors in the movie. but yes I agree with Zeenat, Ab is just JEALOUS!

  19. 19 On January 15th, 2009, mythlace said:

    I dont agree with the big B here, it has nothing to do with the under developed part of India, rather it has focused the bad things going on in the society which needs to be wiped out….

  20. 20 On January 15th, 2009, sandhya said:

    I agree with Zeenat. Big B should know that Mumbai does not mean Jalsha and Pratikchhya or whatever. It does not mean Mannat or some big buildings. Slumdog showed real Mumbai. I did not expect Bachchan to be so ignorant.

  21. 21 On January 15th, 2009, Sheeba K said:

    I agree with Big B about the fact that it takes a western director and a theme like third world poverty to get the west
    interested in any movie about India, but the fact is, he would not have had such misgivings if the movie’s cast had
    had anything to do with his own family. Lil late to be talking about the developed world’s hypocrisy.

  22. 22 On January 16th, 2009, COPYCAT said:

    I agree with zeenat. I think Big B is just has nothing better these day then just sit and blog about every movie. This is real india. You cannot always show india with beautiful guy in rich cars and beautiful girls in rich clothes and there running around singing and dancing and making out with each other. Real India has a lot of proverty in it. It has women living with Aids and HIV and raisign there kids who have them also. Real India is also has kids that have lost there parents and they are on the streets trying to make ends meet. Not everyone in India is names Rahul and can have there dad pay for a ticket to go to Switzerland and travel and fall in love with a girl and then sign and that is all.

    Indian movie makers only know how to copy movies. There has only been very few Indian
    i JUST HE IS PISSED CAUSE HE WASN’T CHOSEN TO PLAY aNIL KAPOOR’S ROLE ‘CAUSE HE WAS THE ORIGINAL HOST OF “KAUN BANEGA KARORPATI”. STOP BEING A SUCK AND GROW UP BIG B. TYPICAL INDIAN NOT HAPPY ON OTHERS SUCCESS CAUSE IT WASN’T HIM OR HIS SON OR HIS DAUGHTER IN LAW.

    #2 IT SHOWS HIM HIS OWN FACE IN THE MIRROR. IT TOOK A FOREIGNER TO MAKE A TRUE MOVIE ABOUT BOMBAY. PLUS DANNY BOYL ACTUALLY TOOK THOSE KID ACTORS LITERALLY OF THE STREET , THE R FROM THE SLUMS NOT ACTORS AND NOT SONS AND DAUGHTERS OF ACTORS. HE HAS ACTUALLY PUT THEM THRU SCHOOL AND MADE A TRUST FUND FOR COLLEGE. ONCE AGAIN IT TOOK A FOREIGNER TO CHANGE THREE CHILDREN’S LIFE . INSTEAD OF GIVING THEM TOYS AND PRESENTS. HE GAVE THEM A CHANCE OF LIFE. WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME ANY OF THESE ACTORS PUT SOMEONE THRU COLLEGE AND DONE IT EVER SO QUIETLY AND HUMILITY. I AM VERY DISAPPOINTED IN YOU MR. BACHAN…

    movies that are not being copied. The movies they use to make talked about the real India. These days there too worried about having the right about of kissing and showing skin to worry about the plot and story of the movie.

    I think he needs to think back about his old movies where he use to work in the type of movies that had meaning and he played the poor guy on the streets a a lot.

    This is nothing to do with Indian or British directors, he is just a jealousy old man..

    lol. I was also just thinking Mr B, if you’re so against Cannes, then why were you so busy making your presence felt there last time?

  23. 23 On January 16th, 2009, ishk said:

    I felt the same way as quoted by BigB..foreigners love to c Indians as poor.
    If exactly d same movie was made by Indian director..i am sure i wud not have been
    recognised at all..evn some india directors make films like these..As Danny Boyle is foreigner..the movie was recognised.
    No doubt movie reveals the real india..think about this..we rich people almost always neglect and make bad faces at the sight of poor begger who begs at our cars window panes..dont u do so..U guys loved the movie and will go to watch in plush theatres..i am sure when u will come out of the theatres..u will never dare to pick up a begger and do some good to her..
    I was really touched by movie but i dint think it was that well shot and acted by..
    amongst all, i loved the acting of just the original slum kids..none else..

    guys Big B is making some another point..He is not that fool to write a thing on his blog that can mar his image..
    I am sure he works for slum and poor people..

  24. 24 On January 16th, 2009, Sami said:

    SM is an ordinary movie. Mr. A R Rahman has given much better music in different bollywood
    movies. The movie is creating buzz internationally because it is directed by a foreigner. If
    it is made by any bollywood director, it would have been forgotten already.
    There is no creadit for India to bag golden globe or oscar with the help of foreigh director. .

  25. 25 On January 16th, 2009, Jasmine said:

    Although I agree that Slumdog Millionaire has been widely recognised and appreciated due to the unfortunate fact that the director is, how should I put it, white, I feel that Amitabh here is possibly a tad resentful, perhaps because he was not a part of something that succeeded on such a scale. The simple truth is that despite being entertaining, a conventional, escapist Bollywood movie does not have enough substance to achieve such success. As for portraying the negative aspects of India, well, there have been many Bollywood movies that have done exactly the same because it is considered a glimpse into reality. And after all, it is based on a novel written by an Indian so lets not point the finger at the white man eh Mr Bachchan!

  26. 26 On January 16th, 2009, Jimmy said:

    Big B is just bitter that he was not a part of the international fame. He is too greedy, it is his greet that is protesting.
    He doesn’t care shit about India and so is his greedy-for-popularity daughter-in-law Ashwariya Rai

  27. 27 On January 16th, 2009, Chandini said:

    i agree jimmy…but u can add Hutch puppy too the Amar Singh :-)

  28. 28 On January 17th, 2009, Mumbai said:

    He has been quoted out of context. You need to read the entire text. He happened to be in Paris and he was mobbed by beggars. That’s when he made this statement that developed countries also have underbellies

  29. 29 On January 17th, 2009, Harish said:

    Look man, the graps that one can’t eat, always tests bitter. I think Bachchan is so jealous of others success, such as SRK’s and Aamir’s…Especially Muslim actors…Bachchan has the background of being comwadi, since he joined the BJP party. I have heard and seen so many thing involving Bachchan, and the decision of him being comwadi and jealous comes from there…

    I’m a big fan of Aamir and when Aamir presented the Bachchanilia, I was so pissed off man..

  30. 30 On January 19th, 2009, Dr. Greenthumb said:

    Wow is Big B really talking about a one-sided depiction of India. I suppose most of India is living the lavishness of the characters he portrays in 90% of his movies. This is not about the portrayal of India, its of a kid who survives the challenges of life in pursuit of love. I cannot think of a more Indian theme than that in Slumdog Millionaire.

  31. 31 On January 20th, 2009, Kiran said:

    This was the greatest movie I have ever seen because it had a genuine realness to it. Who cares what amitha bachan says. He is an untalented idiot who simply can’t act. He looks fake every time he gets in front of the camera dancing and prancing around like a sissy. He is just jealous that Slumdog Millionaire is better than all of his stupid silly garbage movies with plots that were written by 12 year olds. Its about time somebody made a decent Indian movie because Bollywood is a bloody embarrasment and all of their “actors” stink. I hope there is a slumdog sequel because I would rather see some wicked acting and tough actors than some 66 year old washed up actor like bachan shaking his old hips to some tired boring hindi dance music. The reason he is so jealous is because he made the same movie over and over 10000 times in his career and none of them won any praise except from the dummys who will keep paying to watch predictable Bollywood crap. I will never watch a Bollywood movie again (I have only seen 1 by the way and it sucked). We need to create our own Bollywood for dark skinned Indians and make fun of amithab no talent Bachan on our blogs.

  32. 32 On January 20th, 2009, Ravi said:

    Amithab is angry at the director being white? Bachan is the whitest indian on earth. He needs to shut up. Slumdog was great because its about time I get to go to an indian movie and see indians that actually have black hair and are brown and not fake and pale like the Bollywood idiots. Look at BAchan with his dyed chestnut hair and his pale complexion. WHo the hell is he to tell what real India is when he looks like some barbie doll.

  33. 33 On January 21st, 2009, Dev Raj said:

    Perhaps BIG-B’s heart is not so big as his personality.
    What was depicted in SM was a face from a lot of faces of our country.
    his any of the movie could not represent any face perfectly.
    and movie SM remains unaffected by his comment.
    The movie was very much different from bollywood masala & similar love stories and may create success after GHAJINI.

  34. 34 On January 22nd, 2009, Crazy Netizen said:

    Ever since the talks in Media started doing the rounds about the rivalry between SRK & BIG B, I have been holding this view which after reading Bacchhan’s blogs & subsequent comment of readers I cudn’t resist fm sharing it & that is “BIG B is may be a BETTER ACOTR than SRK but SRK is fare more BETTER HUMAN BEING than him.” Bacchants views on SM just suffice my views

  35. 35 On January 23rd, 2009, Adaickalam said:

    SM is an exceptionally good movie. This movie making it to the international arena w/0 the western influence would not have been possible. Bachchan’s cry for ignoring the box office hit films churning out from Mumbai cannot be credited. The westerners do make standard films which are far ahead in terms of quality. Comparing the masala mixed Indian movies with the western films is total rubbish. We Indians really need to think about the people we are comparing ourselves with. You need to show quality in the films that come out from here and then start comparing it with the west.

  36. 36 On January 24th, 2009, sonu said:

    SM is very nicely directed movie, the Indian movies look like Ram leella and amitab is a big joker

  37. 37 On February 23rd, 2009, Reg said:

    A. Bachan has disappointed me and I think he needs to grow up.
    What we need to learn from SM is that there is so much talent in our great country, even from the little children in the slums and not just in Bollywood family circle. I am happy that SM proved a point that we need to think outside Bollywood box and explore the hidden talents of many Indian’s so that the world will know what our country has to offer. Break the wall Bollywood and step out to explore the true colors of our country.

  38. 38 On February 23rd, 2009, Tony said:

    Big B was good in the early days, ever so boring now and churning out same old rubbish with too much polish and zero plot. In the west we are tired of films based on K3G story-lines. Lets see India as it is and yes its taken some one like Boyle to show that with an Indian Mix.

    I hope Big B(afoon) does not get to Hollywood or Pinewood. BTW will Bollywood now change to Mullywood ?

  39. 39 On February 24th, 2009, anon said:

    I agree that Bachchan is plain jealous. He will be happy only if his sons movies get good reviews. Have you guys seen how he has hit critics of Delhi-6 for giving bad reviews? It is curious case of benjamin here. He is

    However, I did not like movie for showing one community of India in bad light. The real book of Vikas Swaroop did not have “Jamaal” as the protogonist. Hindus dont care if anyone is showing them in bad light. Thats why director simply chose to be politically correct. Can you guys imagine what would have been the reaction had it been reversed? There was one small cartoon in Denmark. We all know how violent the situation has become. II hope Indians wake up to the fact and save their identity from a violent communtity.

  40. 40 On February 25th, 2009, gori said:

    Who the hell is Amitabh Bachchan to comment. He is a good actor, well great. That doesnt make him any better than any of us. Who is he to sit in his Ivory tower and talk about the underbelly of india. What has he done in his capacity to fight poverty??? Slum dog millionaire is based on a story. It is hence expected to potray every element required in the story. So what did Mr Bachchan want???? That the story to be altered so that it does not bring out the shallow side of many Indians who shunn away from issues and give india a status of growing economy purely based on their success….. I think Mr bachchan has made a fool of himself and i am glad he made such a selfish comment. Atleasat it will be a good Eye opener for fans like me who now know what he is all about. His attitude( gesture, interaction with a female star) in the premiere at London for Chandni Chowk to China were much shameful than the reality of Indian poverty. Kudos to danny Boyle and his Crew especially the Indian crew and actor

  41. 41 On February 25th, 2009, George C. Jolly said:

    I do not wholly support or am against Mr. Amitabh Bachchan’s comment against Slumdog Millionaire.

    Praising both Danny Boyle, his team behind the scenes and definitely, my Indian brethren, A. R. Rahman and Rasool Pookkutty, I must say that as Indians, we must be proud that a renowed film maker as Danny Boyle selected this Indian theme for his film.

    Slumdog Millionaire conveys a lot more than the youngster winning the Millionaire Quiz show. It really bares the ‘young achievers’ who can be dug out from the interiors of India. We, Indians, have rarely bothered to make such films. During my life in my hometown, Bombay, I used to be amazed at the ‘salesmanship’ of these street children who used to stray around the traffic signals there. Every day, during my trip to work, these little souls appear at my side of the car and extend their palms for some coins. I try my best to ignore, but they cry out from the bottom of their hearts, pointing to their hungry bellies, etc. In the end, they win my heart, and I feel so generous when I help them with either some loose coins or a part or the whole of the snacks in my lunch box.

    Being in the sales career since the last decade and a half, I often think that these children of the streets are no less than ‘active salesmen’, who see to it that they sell off their wares (their agonies) at the traffic signals of Bombay so tactically, and in return, make it a point that they achieve their targets.

    Did we ever wonder that if these little sales heroes were being fostered in better environments, they could be educated well to become the best business hands of our country? Why can’t Mr. Bachchan’s and his other starmates of Bollywood do such good deeds by sponsoring one such child each, from the streets of Bombay, and giving them not just a better life, but definitely a best life, by designing their future, thus changing them into achievers in tomorrow’s world? Or do these tinsel town folks intend to stick to their own dialogue – Akhir Koylay Kay Dhandey may kaun mooh kaalaa karnaa chaaheygaa?

    I take this moment to remind Mr. Amitabh Bachchan of a scene in one of his own bygone movies (do not recollect the name) where there is a scene in which he writes the figure 6 on his palm, and shows it to the person in front of him, saying (in Hindi) – Mujhey yahaa sey yeh 6 dikhaayee deytaa hai, leykin aap jahaa khadey hai, wahaa sey aapko yeh 9 dikhaayee deygaa. Asli baat tho yeh hai ki hum dono apney jagho par sahee hai. Bus dekhney ki nazariyay ka phark hai ( in English – I read this figure as 6, but you will read it as 9 from your side. Both of us are right at our positions, but the difference here is the place from which we view it). So, Mr. Bachchan, your view is yours, and mine comes from my heart.

    Now, if I take Mr. Bachchan’s view for a moment, I would definitely dare to ask the Western world as to why didn’t they bother to grant such mighty accolades to Aamir Khan’s film, Lagaan years ago. I would say that Lagaan was much, much better in all respects than Slumdog Millionaire. Is it because Lagaan showed the poor peasants of India win a cricket match against the British?

    Can I call that some sort of racist, bipartisan attitude towards an Indian film? The Oscar judges panel have to rethink on their wrong judgement about Lagaan.

  42. 42 On July 26th, 2009, truelyfelt-the-filth said:

    Did you observe how humans can be dipped into the toilet in this movie, If you guys cannot speak the worst about the movie, Get into your
    imagination where u were in the same position of dipping in to the toilet, and tell back the truth how filthy smell feels like.

  43. 43 On July 26th, 2009, truelyfelt-the-filth said:

    I remember the Gandhi’s 3 Monkey story about:
    1)Never Speak the bad
    2)Never Listen the bad
    3)Never See the bad
    This movie breaks all the rules of cleanliness which is breaking of godliness. It is an act of Asura(unfriendliness, ungodliness, hatredness).
    I can imagine a link between this movie sponsorship to the event occurred with shilpa shetty around the same topic on slums.
    In actual these lond peoples have got barbarized, undirectioned, they donot have any thing to do, accept creating some nuisance which can make
    a hype and worry the whole civilization.

    I can comfortably say without any hesitation it is a pure act of terrorism, hatreness, unaccptance among a class of people for poor.

  44. 44 On July 26th, 2009, truelyfelt-the-filth said:

    India need not worry much as by awarding golden globe to this movie, The world has axed on their own legs, to be part of the filthy smell.
    Let them enjoy the smell of a filth till they enjoy.

  45. 45 On July 26th, 2009, truelyfelt-the-filth said:

    A good idea for amitabh bachhan, Sir can a movie be sponsored on the topic of “Stray dog beggars” on the theme of: “The source of HIV how did
    it pampered among humans in the western world due to the strayee relationships in western culture”, It will be a perfect answer from India to
    the outside world about the Indian Culture and its benefits.

Leave a Reply

 Subscribe in a reader